Ordering Decimals
"Could I have a 3.65 and an 0.8, please ... ?"
NO, not THAT type of ordering. I mean putting them in order ...
Ordering decimals can be tricky. Because often we look at
0.42 and 0.402 and say that 0.402 must be bigger because there are
more digits. But no! NO, not THAT type of ordering. I mean putting them in order ...
If you follow the following method you will see which decimals are bigger.
- Set up a table with the decimal point in the same place for each number.
- Put in each number.
- Fill in the empty squares with zeros.
- Compare using the first column on the left
- If the digits are equal move to the next column to the right until one number wins.
If you want ascending order you always pick the smallest first
|
||
If you want decending order you always pick the largest first |
Example: Put the following decimals in ascending order:
1.506,
1.56, 0.8
In a table they look like this:Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |
1 | . | 5 | 6 | |
0 | . | 8 |
Fill in the empty squares with zeros:
Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |
1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |
0 | . | 8 | 0 | 0 |
Compare using the first column (Units)
Two of them are "1"s and the other is a "0". Ascending order needs smallest first, and so "0" is the winner:
Answer so far: 0.8
Now we can remove 0.8 from the list:Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
1 | . | 5 | 0 | 6 |
1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |
- | . | - | - | - |
Compare the Tenths
Now there are two numbers with the same "Tenths" value of 5, so move along to the "Hundredths" for the tie-breakerCompare the Hundredths
One of those has a 6 in the hundredths, and the other has a 0, so the 6 wins. So 1.506 is less than 1.56:
Answer so far: 0.8, 1.506
Remove 0.506 from the list:Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
- | . | - | - | - |
1 | . | 5 | 6 | 0 |
- | . | - | - | - |
Answer: 0.8, 1.506, 1.56
Done! Example: Put the following decimals in DESCENDING order:
0.402,
0.42, 0.375, 1.2, 0.85
In a table they look like this:Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |
0 | . | 4 | 2 | |
0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |
1 | . | 2 | ||
0 | . | 8 | 5 |
Fill in the empty squares with zeros:
Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |
0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |
0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |
1 | . | 2 | 0 | 0 |
0 | . | 8 | 5 | 0 |
Compare using the first column (Units):
There is a 1, all the rest are 0. Descending order needs largest first, so 1.2 must be the highest. (Write it down in your answer and cross it off the table).
Answer so far: 1.2
Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |
0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |
0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |
- | - | - | - | - |
0 | . | 8 | 5 | 0 |
Compare the Tenths.
The 8 is highest, so 0.85 is next in value.
Answer so far: 1.2, 0.85
Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
0 | . | 4 | 0 | 2 |
0 | . | 4 | 2 | 0 |
0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |
- | - | - | - | - |
- | - | - | - | - |
One number has a 2 in the hundredths, and the other has a 0, so the 2 wins. So 0.42 is bigger than 0.402:
Answer so far: 1.2, 0.85, 0.42, 0.402
Units | Decimal Point |
Tenths | Hundredths | Thousandths |
- | - | - | - | - |
- | - | - | - | - |
0 | . | 3 | 7 | 5 |
- | - | - | - | - |
- | - | - | - | - |
Answer: 1.2, 0.85, 0.42, 0.402, 0.375